<p>Simplicity, acceptability, and representatives are good (79% easy to use, 90% well integrated into their daily work schedules, and all districts use the system). Stability and data quality are good with adequate supplies and 80% correctly filled in CIFs. Sensitivity is good as the NP-AFP rate is above 2 for 2020 to 2022. Flexibility and timeliness are fair (56% unwelcomed the change of introducing stool runners and the 80% target). The positive predictive value is poor at 47%. Knowledge levels on the case definition of AFP (11%) and the full process of the surveillance (21%) was poor.</p>