<p>Reading through this work one gets a feeling that the title should be on Factors associated with a rapid antigen positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 in Karongi district, Rwanda. But again, this study approach is not powered to elicit factors. This is not a cross-sectional study as indicated, but a records review exercise.</p><p>The background is not bringing out the significance of the study, study problem, and the reason the study is being carried out. The background is not properly punctuated. The authors may also want to position karongi district for the readers. How many districts are there? what's the justification for selecting Karongi? How many health facilities or testing centers are involved? Give information on the testing strategy employed during this period, I mean who gets tested using this method? Be systematic in the methods section on the data analysis and results presentation; descriptive (e.g. frequencies), then bi-variate and finally multi-variate. Avoid abbreviations in the results. How many records were abstracted, against those analyzed?</p><p>&nbsp;</p>