<p>The title does not communicate with background, methods, results and conclusion. If you assess response to food poisoning, the expectation would be that the authors conducted an after action review (AAR) of the response.</p><p>It is not clear which cross-section study was conducted. Was it a cross section of patients who presented with poisoning? What was the population from which the authors picked their study participants?&nbsp;</p><p>No attack rates are presented in the results (the percentages presented by authors are not attack rates) but the authors go ahead to attribute the illness to a high attack rate in their conclusion.&nbsp;</p>