<p>The results showed that the system was good in terms of acceptability (100%) HCWs reported a positive attitude towards its use, representativeness (100%) of facilities participating in AFP activities, and stability (&gt;80%) of supplies for specimen collection and packaging were available. However, we noticed poor performance on timeliness (almost all indicators &lt;80% except one), simplicity ( 25%) of HCWs able to give full case definition for AFP, data quality as CIFs reviewed majority had missing data, sensitivity &lt; 2/100,000 NP-AFP rate in children &lt;15 years as compared to ≥2/100,000 NP-AFP annualized target, and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 53.3%.</p>