<p>The HIV surveillance system operates as a passive surveillance system. Data reporting is done monthly; feedback and supervision are done quarterly. Simplicity was good, with 69% of respondents saying that the case definition was easy to use. Acceptability was good, with 79% of the respondents saying that healthcare workers were willing to participate in the system. Stability was good, with 73% of the respondents stating that the system did not experience a breakdown. Representativeness was poor, as private health facilities do not perform HIV surveillance. Sensitivity was good, with a score of 90%. The usefulness was average, with 57% of respondents saying actions were taken on generated data.</p>