The results showed that the system was good in terms of acceptability (100%) HCWs reported a positive attitude towards its use, representativeness (100%) of facilities participating in AFP activities, and stability (&amp;gt;80%) of supplies for specimen collection and packaging were available. However, we noticed poor performance on timeliness (almost all indicators &amp;lt;80% except one), simplicity ( 25%) of HCWs able to give full case definition for AFP,  data quality as CIFs reviewed majority had missing data, sensitivity &amp;lt; 2/100,000 NP-AFP rate in children &amp;lt;15 years as compared to ≥2/100,000 NP-AFP annualized target, and  Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 53.3%.