<p>In the introduction, you must first explain why this investigation must be &nbsp;performed, how the measles surveillance function in your country (with a simple sentence) &nbsp;is there any gap in that situation? The objective is not clear, what do you think about "post riposte", why only suspected cases</p><p>In methods, there are no informations about use of case definition, data analysis (indicators calculated)</p><p>In results : I think the first sentence seems a conclusion. In your objective you concerns only the suspected cases, but you show also here the confirmed case. You must mention in the method that you have looked at the vaccine managment and the vaccine cover</p><p>In conclusion : I'm not convinced with your conclusion because there is not a real relation of the results (there is no information about the performance of heath facilities in notification : why<strong> low</strong>??). In addition, the recomandations are missing.</p>