<p>A total of 14 key informants were included and interviewed; response rate was 100%. All stakeholders explained easiness of surveillance forms and procedures, and communication channel and information flow. The completeness and timeliness of monthly reports were 98.0% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity of hypertension surveillance system was 100% while positive predictive value was 92.6% and its representativeness was 67%. Health facilities didn’t conduct routine data analysis. The 50% of respondents explained an unstable system including shortage of trained staff, program dependency on partners, and absence of regular supportive supervision and feedback.</p>