<p>Introduction: Defining what surveillance is, says less about the most important things, which should rather be about introducing Hypertension and its epidemiology.</p><p>Method: How was the evaluation conducted and attributes measured? Desist from mentioning statistical software. Really questionable how this evaluation was conducted in just one month.</p><p>Results: The author presented proportions without their respective frequencies. What were the specific results/outputs from the attributes measured?</p><p>Conclusion: The basis for indicating that the attributes and performance were low was not justified in the results.</p>