<p>BACKGROUND</p><p>The study is not properly justified</p><p>The objective is not clear</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>METHODS</p><p>The methods is not comprehensive with key areas missing</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>RESULTS</p><p>Due to the poor nature of the methods section, it is difficult to understand the results since the authors are making comparisons to set targets which were not stated in the methods section.</p><p>Evaluating a system encompasses a lot, due to the manner in which the authors stated their objective, its not clear which areas of the program they evaluated and how they came about their findings</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>CONCLUSION</p><p>The conclusion provided by the authors is not an interpretation of the study results.&nbsp;</p>