<p>All interviewers 100% (36/36) knew the malaria case definition, reported that the data management tools were easy to use, and correctly described the information flow at three levels (district-provincial-national). They also reported that analyzed surveillance data was used for decision-making. According to 89% (32/36) of interviewed, the introduction of the new variable “fever” was successfully done and did not interfere with the system's operation. Timeliness and completeness of data over the five years were 92% and 97.8% respectively. The collection, processing, analysis and submission of the monthly summary within the established period (21-25) may have contributed to not reaching the 100% target</p>