The study employs a mixed-methods approach, including surveys, interviews, and secondary data analysis. The use of a scorecard model for evaluating preparedness is appropriate. Simple random sampling is mentioned, and the population involved is defined. On the other hand, descriptions of critical definitions, such as what qualifies as "emergency preparedness," "public awareness," or "case definitions," are missing or unclear. Statistical methods are mentioned only vaguely as "scientifically conducted" without specifying models or statistical tests. More details on data sources (e.g., survey questionnaires or health registries) would improve transparency.